Allos 01 ¡ Product design ¡ Data as a Service

Store Insights

Research, design and evolution of the report that turns mall sales data into decisions for store owners.

Client
ALLOS
Year
2025 to 2026
Role
Product Designer
Services
Product design
Research
Design system
ALLOS | Store Insights logo in white on a teal background.
01

Summary

Monetizing data from the ALLOS benefits program.

I was the designer in charge of Store Insights end to end. I ran all the research, defined the information architecture and designed the report and Allan's WhatsApp messages.

Role
Product Designer
Team
Product Manager, Product Owner, Data Engineer and Sales
Deliverables
Store Insights Branches (the store), Store Insights Chains (the brand) and Allan on WhatsApp
Methods
Sales discovery, CSD matrix, personas, Feedback interviews, research repository and backlog prioritization
02

Context

ALLOS's challenge was to monetize what the benefits program revealed about the users who upload receipts. ALLOS manages the malls and sees the sales of every store. Through the program, it also sees who buys: customers register their receipt in the app in exchange for benefits, and the receipt reaches the data lake the next day. From the app onboarding, ALLOS also has demographic and personal data on this audience.

  • 2.2Mactive app users (Dec 2025)
  • 37malls with a loyalty program
  • R$ 5.6Bin sales recognized by the program in 2025, 15.7% of ALLOS sales

The Data as a Service team, within Monetization, bet that store owners would pay to know three things: where they lose sales, who their audience is and how they compare with competitors in the same mall.

03

Problem

The first version was a monthly PDF report, built from the data ALLOS had, and store owners couldn't get a decision out of it.

Who am I being compared with?

O Paulistinha franchisee, fast food, Campo Grande

I want to tell Allan myself how I want the data.

O BoticĂĄrio franchisee, cosmetics, Plaza NiterĂłi

With no clear period, no way of knowing whose number each one was and no fair comparison, the data seemed unreliable. Store owners were afraid of misreading it and abandoned parts of the report. In sales, the problem repeated itself: the pitch got lost on WhatsApp, the ALLOS number was unknown and the free trial format made people afraid of being signed up for a mandatory subscription.

04

Research

  1. 01

    Sales discovery

    Listening to sales calls and meetings between July and August 2025, a certainties, assumptions and doubts matrix, and two store owner profiles: those who know data and those who don't.

  2. 02

    Feedback

    Seven interviews with subscribing store owners in cosmetics, food, restaurants and leisure, reading their own report with me.

  3. 03

    Research repository

    Every reaction became a research record, classified by indicator, experience, theme and opportunity.

  4. 04

    Synthesis

    Insights and recommendations per interview, split into product and UX, technology and AI, and sales, already prioritized.

"Feedbacks" list in the Monetization Hub on ALLOS's SharePoint: each row is a research record, with user, text, indicator, experience (good, neutral or bad), opportunity, comment, product, moderator, line of business, segment, mall and date.
The research repository in the Monetization Hub: each row is a store owner's reaction, classified by indicator, experience, opportunity, product, line of business, segment and mall.
Research repository: 102 entries from 7 interviews, an indicator-by-experience board sorted by friction, automatic themes and experience mix per participant.
The research repository: each indicator crossed with experience, sorted by friction, with themes and participants alongside.
Repository filtered by the Market Share indicator and grouped by participant, with each store owner's reactions and the experience of each one.
Filter by indicator: every reaction to market share, grouped by store owner.
Detail of a record: a bad reaction marked as an opportunity, comment, participant, indicators, themes, product, line of business and segment, date, moderation and other records on the same indicator.
Each record opens with the comment, the interview context and other reactions to the same indicator.
05

Operational map

The operational map covered contact management, over-delivery, B2B CRM, negotiation, closing and billing, product, flow, feedback and research.

Store Insights operational map (flow v3) in FigJam: instructions and goal on the left and, on the right, the stages in columns with actions, owners, details, tools, pain points in red and opportunities in green.
Store Insights operational map, flow v3.
06

Personas

Store Insights has three personas. In Chains, the franchise manager, who follows the brand across the country, regions and markets. In Branches, the owner, who looks at the big picture of the business, and the store manager, who is on the front line of operations.

Chains ¡ Franchise manager

Context and routine
Works in a multi-unit context, making decisions for more than one store and/or market. Reviews performance periodically and "locks in" growth priorities, asking for action plans and refining the routine analysis.
Motivations and emotions
Driven by clarity to decide "where to bet" and "where to correct course" without wasting time on data that isn't comparable. Gets anxious when the data seems "mixed" (unfaithful comparisons) and when there are no clear levers to raise loyalty/recurrence and results per store.
Goals

Prioritize growth opportunities (market share and productivity, such as sales/m²) and set focus by market/segment.

Understand the makeup and quality of the customer base (e.g. segmentation by "stars" or program, below-average recurrence) to design a loyalty strategy.

Validate the impact of programs and benefits (promotions, mall subsidies, etc.) and decide where to expand/adjust the initiative.

Pain points

Needs clear context to justify actions internally (leadership questions the numbers).

Visibility into where to correct course or act on share lost to competitors.

Lack of a full view when building strategies that scale.

Behavior with the report

Uses the report as a governance input: compares month over month and against the "market/competitors", looks for rankings/benchmarks and asks questions to adjust the reading.

Connects insights to initiatives (benefit programs, loyalty) and already thinks about "how to scale" activation, including incentives for operations and growing the registered/identified base.

Branches ¡ Owner

Context and routine
Looks at the big picture of their own business. Usually reviews numbers with someone else (e.g. on a computer, in a meeting room) and needs to "read" the report calmly to interpret it correctly.
Motivations and emotions
Gets anxious when they don't understand exactly what they're comparing (line of business vs. segment; who the direct competitors are).
Goals

Quickly understand whether a drop/rise is "mine" or the market's (comparisons and YoY base) to decide on corrective action.

Validate the impact of programs and benefits (promotions, mall subsidies, etc.) and decide where to expand/adjust the initiative.

Pain points
Visibility into where to correct course or act on lost share.
Behavior with the report
Asks clarifying questions, looking for confirmation so as not to misread before taking action in the store.

Branches ¡ Store manager

Context and routine
On the front line: runs the store day to day, under pressure for immediate results and operational decisions (staffing, approach, promotions).
Motivations and emotions
Driven by "what do I do now" to sell more without shooting in the dark. Gets anxious when the data isn't recent (wants a weekly/biweekly view).
Goals
Monitor actionable indicators (ticket, sales, market share in the segment) to guide promotions, staffing and sales execution.
Pain points
Execution blocked by operational constraints (labor, seasonality, staffing) and difficulty putting ideas into practice even when they already know "what they should do".
Behavior with the report
Uses the report as a diagnostic "check" and then turns it into practical actions.
07

What I learned

Trust in the data
Store owners kept coming back to the same number trying to understand the period, the base and the calculation.
The comparison has to be fair
A restaurant doesn't want to be compared with the food court, nor a store with a kiosk.
Monthly isn't enough
Store owners make decisions every day, so data needs to arrive quickly and often, with monthly, biweekly, weekly and daily views. Each frequency calls for its own reading, customizable by context.
A number on its own is misleading
A lower average ticket can be good with high volume. Seeing purchases alongside the ticket helps explain the number, and charts need to be grouped for a more accurate reading.
The report is a management tool
It was forwarded to the franchisor and leadership to justify results and ask for support. It had to be ready to pass on.
08

From finding to solution

Each pain point became a design decision:

"When is this number from?"
Period visible at the top of each chart and indicator.
"Is this number just for my store?"
A label saying whose number it is (store, line of business or segment) inside the chart itself.
"Who am I being compared with?"
Line of business and segment fixed at the top of each page. Comparison with other brands only when there are at least five in the segment (LGPD, Brazil's data protection law).
"Where does this data come from?"
Source written in Allan's message itself: "Source: Benefits Program".
"My ticket is lower. Is that bad?"
Paired metrics: ticket with number of purchases, market share with sales.
"Monthly isn't enough."
Weekly summary on WhatsApp. Daily data went into the roadmap.
"I want to ask my own way."
Open questions in Allan 2.0, on the roadmap.
"I'm going to send this to the franchisor."
An Overview at the start of the report, with the main indicators on one page.
09

Indicator anatomy

A standard for building and displaying indicators.

Competitive Positioning page of Store Insights Chains with six callouts: line of business and segment at the top, table by region, period next to the title, a one-sentence definition of the block, market share in the line of business next to the segment, and the brand's year-over-year growth against the line of business and segment. Alongside, the legend with the six callouts.
The anatomy applied to the Competitive Positioning page of Store Insights Chains.
10

Report

Two versions: Branches, for the store owner and manager, and Chains, for the brand manager.

11

Allan on WhatsApp

Allan delivers Store Insights on WhatsApp: an introduction with a free sample, a weekly summary, trends with suggested actions, an invitation to Premium and a satisfaction survey. The buttons in each message follow the navigation tree.

Allan's decision tree in two flows of the free cadence, segmented and standard: acceptance message, receiving the data, invitation to learn about Premium, scheduling with a specialist, retention messages for those who decline and quarantine, with arrows linking each button to the next message.
Allan - Navigation tree - Free flow
12

Design system

The report and Allan follow the ALLOS identity and use the same data language: the same indicator names, comparison with line of business and segment, and change always shown with sign and unit (%, p.p.).

13

Decisions and trade-offs

Cutting views from Chains
High-effort, low-value views were removed until there were enough customers. What stayed got a better explanation.
Segment as the default comparison
It is the direct competition. The line of business appears as context.
Paired metrics
Each number got the partner that prevents misreading it.
WhatsApp as the main channel
Store owners already use WhatsApp every day. The summary reaches them where they are.
Only promise what the roadmap delivers
A promise of daily data that never arrived shook trust. I aligned the sales pitch with the roadmap and created a glossary and an explanation of where the data comes from for the sales team.
14

Roadmap

The syntheses became 24 prioritized recommendations, 8 of them quick wins (in the Results section).

Now
Full clarity on metrics, a transparent comparison set, a source badge, weekly and daily data, a market conversion module and Allan 2.0 with open questions.
Mid term
Results of campaigns and benefits, year-over-year history, alerts when the segment grows and the store drops, co-consumption and partnerships.
Vision
Comparison between the brand's own stores across several markets.
15

Results

  • 3products live: Branches, Chains and Allan
  • 102research records that became backlog and sales pitch
  • 24prioritized recommendations, 8 quick wins
  • R$ 322Kin Monetization revenue from January to June 2026, with 145 campaigns and 10 clients

The product went from a monthly PDF to weekly tracking, on the store owner's own channel, with every number explained.

16

Learnings

  • ContextIn a data product, period, source and comparison have to be on screen. Without them, store owners don't trust the number.
  • ChannelA report store owners don't open doesn't change any decision, which is why the channel matters as much as the content.
  • SalesWhen sales promises what the roadmap doesn't deliver, the interface loses the trust it built. Design also started reviewing the sales pitch.